Legal Scholars have debated this question and no exact definition exists, especially when considered across cultures and history. Western legal scholars have focused on the importance of generally applicable rules over ad hoc commands and supremacy of reason over arbitrariness. See T.R.S. Allan, Rule of Law, in 3 The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics and the Law 369 (Peter Newman ed., 1998). Such definitions may, but do no necessarily, imply Western-style democratic institutions, capitalism, and human rights.
Regardless of the lack of precise definition, there are certain check lists and factors which are useful in recognizing the rule of law, based upon two levels of analysis (known as "thick" and "thin" theories, the latter of which is more rigorous).
"Thin Theory"--The law must be:
|
"Thick Theories" address the following additional
elements:
|
| Source: Randall Peerenboom, China's Long March Toward the Rule of Law 3 (2002) (citing Lon Fuller, The Morality of Law (1976)). | |
Another approach is to consider the various alternative states by which a society is governed--rule of law, rule of individual will, rule of the mob.
|
|
All societies find themselves at some point within the plane of this triangle.